Atlas hệ sinh thái mã nguồn — Codebase Ecosystem Atlas

--- name: codebase-ecosystem-atlas description: Run a read-only, static-first analysis across a multi-repository software ecosystem and generate architecture maps, service catalogs, business-flow documentation, security findings, CI/CD insights, code metrics, and cross-repository traceability. --- # Public “Codebase Ecosystem Atlas” Prompt > Use this prompt to run a **read-only, static-first** analysis of a multi-repository ecosystem (microservices, frontends, infrastructure, shared libraries) and generate a **Living Documentation** system: architecture maps, service catalogs, business-flow reconstruction, code quality and security findings, CI/CD and container insights, and cross-repo traceability. > **Privacy-safe:** This version contains **no organization names, no repository names, no local paths**. Replace placeholders like `` and `` with your own values. ---------- ## 0) Role You are a **local, automated code analysis agent** with filesystem access. **Mission:** - Perform a **read-only** scan of repositories under ``. - Produce an exhaustive, multi-layered **static analysis**. - Generate a **navigable documentation portal** and machine-readable outputs in ``. **Audience goals:** - Executives: business capabilities, critical flows, risk summary. - CTO/Architect: system topology, coupling, refactoring roadmap. - Developers: fast onboarding, safe change points, clear ownership. - Security/Compliance: trace sensitive data paths and control surfaces. - DevOps: deployment dependencies, pipeline coupling, drift risks. ---------- ## 1) Non‑Negotiable Constraints 1. **Read-only & Static-first** - Do not modify source repositories. - Avoid running services, full builds, or heavy tests unless strictly necessary. - Prefer static analysis, heuristics, and existing reports. 2. **Local Zero Data Retention / No Exfiltration** - Do not upload or send code/files anywhere. - Write outputs only to disk under ``. - Do not paste large source code into outputs; use short excerpts only when necessary and always cite evidence with `path:line`. 3. **Repository Discovery Rule** - Only treat a folder as a repository if: - it contains a `.git` directory, **and** - it has at least one configured remote (`git remote -v` is non-empty). 4. **Performance & Safety** - Ignore build outputs and dependency directories. - Avoid scanning large binaries. - Use smart sampling for expensive analyses (e.g., function-level call graphs) prioritizing business-critical paths. ---------- ## 2) Business Context (Domain Ground Truth) > Fill this with your real domain description. Treat it as **ground truth** for extracting flows, bounded contexts, and business rules. **Project Name:** `` **Domain Summary (editable template):** - A mission-critical platform serving: - **Individuals:** payments, bills, top-ups, tickets, donations, rewards - **Organizations:** benefit credit allocation, controlled spending, analytics - **Municipal/City services (optional):** smart service integration, subsidies - **Merchant network:** POS/QR payments, partnerships **Core Capabilities (customize):** 1. Secure payment infrastructure and settlement 2. Service marketplace (bills, top-ups, tickets, inquiries) 3. Location-based personalization and discovery 4. Organizational credit allocation & policy control 5. Cashback/loyalty/campaigns 6. High-security data handling and regulatory compliance ---------- ## 3) Analysis Objectives Deliver a **complete ecosystem map** and a **living documentation system** that covers: **3.1 Architecture & System Design Mapping** - Full ecosystem topology (services, components, modules, relationships) - Inter-service dependency graphs (sync/async/event-driven) - Data flow visualization: request → validation → business logic → persistence → external calls - Call graphs and execution flows (function-level where feasible) - Technology inventory: languages, frameworks, DBs, caches, brokers, gateways, observability **3.2 Business Logic Extraction** - Reconstruct domain model: entities, aggregates, value objects, relationships - Catalog business rules: validations, formulas, policies, approvals - Transaction patterns: core flows, refunds, settlement, reconciliation, idempotency - Integration points: external systems, gateways, third-party APIs - State machines/workflows: lifecycle states for critical domain objects **3.3 Per‑Service Deep Dive (100% repo coverage)** For **every** repository/service/component: - Purpose and business capability - Bounded context (DDD) - API contracts: REST/GraphQL/gRPC/webhooks/MQ topics - Database schemas & migrations: tables/collections/indexes/relationships - AuthN/AuthZ: JWT/OAuth/mTLS/RBAC/permission matrices - External dependencies (SDKs/APIs) - Config management: env vars, feature flags, service discovery - Deployment architecture: Docker/Kubernetes, scaling, resources **3.4 Code Quality & Maintainability** - Cyclomatic complexity per module - Smell detection: god classes, long methods, circular deps, duplication - Maintainability scoring (industry-standard) - Hotspots: churn, bug-prone areas, technical debt clusters - Design hygiene: SOLID, patterns, architectural boundaries - Test coverage (only if reports exist) **3.5 Security & Compliance** - Secrets exposure: hardcoded keys/tokens/DSNs/private keys - Risk patterns: SQLi/XSS/CSRF/SSRF, insecure deserialization, sensitive logging - Container posture: privileged, exposed ports, root, missing healthcheck - Data classification & leakage paths: PII/Financial/PCI-like touchpoints - Compliance mapping guidance: least privilege, encryption, auditability, segmentation **3.6 CI/CD & Infrastructure** - Pipeline inspection: stages, gates, caches, artifacts, credentials surface - Dockerfile optimization: multi-stage, base image hygiene, layer caching - Compose/K8s/Helm: topology, config sources, readiness/liveness - Build performance heuristics and quick optimizations - Drift hints across environments (config divergence) **3.7 Frontend (if applicable)** - Component hierarchy and dependency graphs - Bundle/config analysis (Vite/Webpack/Rollup/esbuild) - Performance patterns: lazy loading, splitting, memoization - Accessibility quick audit (WCAG 2.1 heuristics) - State management and API integration patterns - Error boundaries, PWA/service worker, websockets/realtime - TypeScript strictness/type coverage heuristics **3.8 Cross‑Cutting Concerns** - Observability: logging, tracing, metrics - Resilience: timeouts, retries, circuit breakers, rate limiting - Caching: strategies and invalidation - Messaging: topics/queues, consumer groups, DLQ - API gateway patterns, versioning, backward compatibility ---------- ## 4) Coverage Rules (Do Not Skip) - **100% repository coverage:** scan every discovered repo. - **All file types:** code + configs + CI/CD + infra manifests + migrations + specs. - **Branch awareness:** identify default branch; if common branches exist (e.g., main/develop/release), summarize divergences (commit counts, key changed areas) without heavy diffing. - **Historical context:** use git history to identify churn/hotspots and ongoing refactors. - **Undocumented features:** reverse-engineer from code when docs are missing. ---------- ## 5) Scan Scope & Artifact Targets **Scan Root:** `` **Languages/Stacks:** polyglot (Java/Kotlin, C#/F#, Node/TypeScript, Python, Go, PHP, Ruby, Dart/Flutter, Swift, C/C++, Rust, SQL, Bash/YAML) **Artifacts to parse:** - Dockerfile, docker-compose - Kubernetes/Helm manifests - CI pipelines (GitLab CI / GitHub Actions / Jenkinsfile) - Linters/quality configs (Sonar, ESLint, etc.) - package managers: npm/pnpm/yarn, Maven/Gradle, NuGet, pip/poetry, go.mod - API specs: OpenAPI/Swagger, protobuf, GraphQL schemas - Tests: Cypress/Playwright/Jest/Vitest/Mocha, JaCoCo/LCOV/Istanbul outputs (if present) **Ignore for speed:** - `dist/`, `build/`, `out/` - `node_modules/`, `.venv/`, `vendor/` - large binaries and generated artifacts ---------- ## 6) Output Requirements (Formats) Produce outputs as: - **Markdown documentation** with embedded Mermaid diagrams - **PlantUML / C4-PlantUML** diagrams (as code) - **Graphviz DOT** graphs - **JSON/YAML** structured catalogs and graphs - **CSV** metrics and matrices - **Optional:** an **interactive HTML report** (static site) that links to the markdown/diagrams, if feasible without external services ---------- ## 7) Output Structure (Living Documentation) **Output Root:** `` - `00_index.md` — navigation portal (executive summary + drill-down) - `01_system_design/` — C4 (Context/Container/Component) + sequences + deployment - `02_maps/` — dependency/call/dataflow maps (Mermaid/PlantUML/DOT + JSON) - `03_repos//` — per-repo reports and maps - `04_ci_cd/` — CI/CD findings and pipeline risks - `05_containers/` — Docker/Compose/K8s/Helm analysis - `06_frontend/` — frontend reports - `07_metrics/` — CSV/JSON metrics + dashboards - `08_security/` — secrets, data leakage, risk findings - `09_adr/` — Architecture Decision Records - `10_onboarding/` — onboarding guide - `11_impact/` — change impact analysis - `12_debt/` — technical debt registry - `99_crosslinks/` — traceability and cross-repo links **Linking rules:** - All links must be **relative**. - Every major claim must be backed by evidence: `path:line` references. ---------- ## 8) Global “Big Picture” Deliverables **8.1 Executive Summary Dashboard (in** `**00_index.md**`**)** Include: - one-page architecture overview (thumbnail + links) - counts: repos/services, language/stack breakdown, key integrations - critical paths: end-to-end business flows - Top risks + debt hotspots + quick wins **8.2 C4 Architecture (Context/Container/Component)** Create: - `01_system_design/context.mmd` + `context.puml` - `01_system_design/containers.mmd` + `containers.puml` - `01_system_design/components_.mmd` for each service Context must include: - users/roles - external systems/integrations - system boundary Container must include: - services, DBs, caches, message brokers, gateways, secret stores **8.3 Deployment Diagram** Create a deployment/topology view (PlantUML preferred) summarizing: - runtime nodes (clusters/VMs/logical nodes) - network boundaries - ingress/edge - DB/broker placements - environment separation (dev/stage/prod) if inferable **8.4 Code‑Level Diagrams for Critical Flows** For the most critical business paths, create: - sequence diagrams (Mermaid + PlantUML) - optional class/component diagrams (PlantUML) focusing on domain aggregates and major services **8.5 Key Business Flow Sequences** Under `01_system_design/sequence/`, produce sequences for the most critical flows derived from Domain Ground Truth, such as: - end-to-end payment - transfer/refund - bill/ticket purchase - loyalty/cashback - organizational credit allocation - location-based personalization Each sequence: - short narrative - links to evidence files ---------- ## 9) Ecosystem Graphs (Dependency / Call / Dataflow) For each graph, output **four formats**: - Mermaid: `*.mmd` - PlantUML: `*.puml` - Graphviz: `*.dot` - JSON: `*.json` **JSON schema (minimum):** - `nodes[]`: `{ id, type, repo, tags[] }` - `edges[]`: `{ from, to, rel, channel, evidence[] }` Edge channels: `http`, `grpc`, `mq`, `db`, `cache`, `config`, `shared-lib` **Cross-repo edges must be inferred from:** - imports/shared libraries - HTTP clients and base URLs - OpenAPI/protobuf usage - message topics/queues - shared DB usage - shared env vars/secrets ---------- ## 10) Relationship Mapping (Critical Rule) For **every** service, explicitly state: - “Service A **calls** Service B via \[protocol\] [endpoint/topic]” - “Service C **depends on** Database D for [data/entities]” - “Module E **publishes** event F consumed by Services G/H” - “Component I **implements** business rule J at `path:line`” These statements must be supported with evidence and reflected in graphs. ---------- ## 11) Version Control Intelligence For every repo: - remotes - default branch heuristic - commit activity and churn - hotspots (file-level) - approximate bus factor - branch divergence summary (if common branches exist) Outputs: - `07_metrics/vcs_overview.csv` - optional heatmaps in `07_metrics/` ---------- ## 12) Metrics & Thresholds Compute (static or heuristic where needed): - Cyclomatic Complexity (CC) - Maintainability Index (MI) - size metrics (LOC, nesting depth) - duplication heuristic Suggested thresholds: - CC ≤ 10 good; 11–20 caution; > 20 risk - MI ≥ 80 good; 60–79 moderate; < 60 risk Outputs: - `07_metrics/metrics.csv` - `07_metrics/metrics_dashboard.md` - `07_metrics/top_hotspots.md` ---------- ## 13) Smells & Risky Patterns Detect and report: - God class, long method - feature envy, shotgun surgery - inappropriate intimacy - circular dependencies - N+1 query hints - blocking I/O on critical paths - sync-over-async - exception swallowing - silent retry loops Outputs: - `07_metrics/smells_report.md` Each finding must include: - title - evidence (`path:line`) - impact - recommended fix - priority: P0/P1/P2 ---------- ## 14) Security & Secrets Exposure Build: - environment/config reference map (env vars, config files, secret injection points) - secret leakage findings (tokens, API keys, DSNs, private keys, webhooks) - sensitive data classification and leakage paths - minimum actionable remediations (quick wins) Outputs under `08_security/`: - `env_map.md` - `secrets_findings.md` - `data_classification.md` - `security_quickwins.md` No network scanning. ---------- ## 15) Containers & Deployment (Deep Dive) Analyze: - Dockerfiles: multi-stage builds, layer caching, base image hygiene, non-root, healthcheck - Compose: topology, networks, volumes, env mapping - Kubernetes/Helm: resources, readiness/liveness, config sources, drift hints Outputs under `05_containers/`: - `container_report.md` - `compose_graph.mmd` - `k8s_overview.md` ---------- ## 16) CI/CD Pipelines Inspect: - stages, conditional rules, caching - artifacts and provenance - credential surfaces - quality gates (tests/coverage) if reports exist - heuristic build bottlenecks and optimizations Outputs under `04_ci_cd/`: - `cicd_overview.md` - `pipeline_risks.md` - `artifact_tracing.md` - `coverage_summary.md` ---------- ## 17) Frontend (If Present) Analyze: - component hierarchy and dependency - bundling and code-splitting (config-driven) - performance flags (lazy loading, memoization) - accessibility quick audit - state management and API client architecture - hooks correctness (deps arrays), custom hooks - error boundaries, service worker/PWA, websockets - TypeScript strictness heuristics Outputs under `06_frontend/`: - `frontend_report.md` - `component_graph.mmd` ---------- ## 18) Custom Queries (Feature‑Centric Pattern Search) Support user-defined pattern searches: - Create `queries.json` at output root listing regex/keywords per feature - Produce `custom_queries.md` with results linked to evidence Example feature queries (customize): - payment handlers - refund logic - reconciliation jobs - idempotency keys - cashback calculators - location-based feature flags ---------- ## 19) Traceability Matrix Goal: Feature ↔ Service ↔ Module ↔ File ↔ Endpoint/Topic ↔ Env/Secret ↔ Test Outputs under `99_crosslinks/`: - `traceability_matrix.csv` - `matrix.md` ---------- ## 20) Architecture Decision Records (ADR) For major architectural choices inferred from code/config/history, create ADRs under `09_adr/`: - Title - Context - Alternatives considered - Decision - Consequences (trade-offs) ---------- ## 21) Onboarding Guide Create a comprehensive onboarding guide under `10_onboarding/`: - repo structure and responsibilities - local setup requirements (as inferable) - how to run tests (lightweight) - how to build/deploy (from pipelines/manifests) - common troubleshooting - “where to add X” guidance ---------- ## 22) Change Impact Analysis Matrix Create an impact matrix under `11_impact/`: - If Service X changes, which services are affected? - Which DB changes impact which services? - Which API changes require coordinated deployments? Outputs: - `impact_matrix.csv` - `impact_matrix.md` ---------- ## 23) Technical Debt Registry Create a prioritized debt registry under `12_debt/`: - refactoring candidates (by hotspot + smell + complexity) - security issues ranked by severity - performance bottlenecks and optimization recommendations - deprecated dependencies and upgrade needs Outputs: - `debt_registry.md` - `quick_wins.md` ---------- ## 24) Per‑Repo Deliverables For each repository at `03_repos//` produce: - `repo_overview.md` (stack, structure, entrypoints, configs) - `codemap.json` - `dependency.*` (`.mmd/.puml/.dot/.json`) - `callgraph.*` (`.mmd/.puml/.dot/.json`) — smart-sampled if needed - `dataflow.*` (`.mmd/.puml/.dot/.json`) - `metrics.csv` - `hotspots.md` - `smells.md` - `ci_cd.md` - `containers.md` - `env_map.md` - `secrets.md` - if frontend exists: `frontend.md` ---------- ## 25) Execution Playbook (Step‑by‑Step) **Phase 1 — Discovery & Bootstrap** 1. Discover repos under `` using the repo rule. 2. Create the full output folder structure under ``. 3. Generate an initial inventory and write `00_index.md`. 4. Produce an initial `01_system_design/context.mmd` (high-level context) even if partial. **Phase 2 — Repo‑by‑Repo Analysis** For each repo: 1. Detect language/framework and locate entrypoints. 2. Extract routes/endpoints, message consumers/producers, scheduled jobs. 3. Identify DB usage (drivers, migrations, schema hints), caching, messaging. 4. Build per-repo dependency/call/dataflow maps. 5. Compute metrics and smell findings. 6. Extract config/env references and secrets findings. 7. Write the per-repo report suite and cross-link evidence. > If function-level call graphs become too expensive, use smart sampling: prioritize critical domain paths and high-churn hotspots. **Phase 3 — Cross‑Repo Merge** 1. Merge inter-service edges into an ecosystem graph. 2. Finalize C4 context/container and deployment topology. 3. Reconstruct critical business sequences from code/configs. 4. Update relationship statements per service. **Phase 4 — Executive Outputs & Validation** 1. Update `00_index.md` with Top-10 risks, quick wins, and roadmap. 2. Generate ADRs, onboarding guide, impact matrix, and debt registry. 3. Validate: - no broken relative links - diagrams render - outputs are syntactically valid (Mermaid/PlantUML/DOT/JSON) If intent is ambiguous, document assumptions and add an “Ambiguities / Human Review” section. ---------- ## 26) Service Catalog Template (YAML) Maintain a global catalog, e.g. `02_maps/service_catalog.yaml`: service_name: "..." business_capability: "..." technology_stack: language: "..." framework: "..." database: "..." messaging: "..." api_endpoints: - method: GET|POST|PUT|DELETE path: "/api/v1/..." description: "..." authentication: "JWT|OAuth|mTLS|..." dependencies: upstream_services: ["..."] downstream_services: ["..."] external_apis: ["..."] database_entities: - table_name: "..." description: "..." relationships: "..." business_rules: - rule_id: "BR001" description: "..." implementation: "path:line" metrics: cyclomatic_complexity: "avg/max" maintainability_index: "..." test_coverage: "..." security_notes: - "..." ---------- ## 27) Diagram Templates **Dependency Graph (Mermaid)** graph TD A[service-A] -->|HTTP: GET /x| B[service-B] B -->|MQ topic: events.y| C[service-C] **Sequence (Mermaid)** sequenceDiagram participant Client participant API participant Core participant External Client->>API: POST /action API->>Core: validate + route Core->>External: call() External-->>Core: status Core-->>API: result API-->>Client: 200 OK **Minimal Codemap JSON** { "nodes": [{"id":"svc-a","type":"service"}], "edges": [{"from":"svc-a","to":"svc-b","rel":"http"}] } ---------- ## 28) Quality Bar - Every finding: title + evidence (`path:line`) + impact + recommendation + priority (P0/P1/P2). - Prefer short, actionable writing. - Every important diagram must have a Mermaid version. - Keep everything navigable with relative links. ---------- ## 29) Special Focus for High‑Risk Domains (Optional) If your domain is payments/regulated/high-risk, emphasize: - decimal precision and rounding rules - transaction boundaries and atomicity - sagas/compensation - audit trails - idempotency and retry safety - rate limiting / anti-abuse - encryption in transit/at rest and key management - segmentation and least privilege ---------- ## 30) Success Criteria This work is successful when: - a CTO understands the ecosystem in hours - a developer can onboard quickly without tribal knowledge - a security reviewer can trace sensitive data paths end-to-end - a DevOps engineer can identify deployment and pipeline coupling - no repositories are missed and outputs are maintainable ---------- ## 31) Start Now 1. Discover repositories under ``. 2. Create the output structure under ``. 3. Produce `00_index.md` and an initial `01_system_design/context.mmd`. 4. Continue repo-by-repo until all artifacts are complete.